首页> 外文OA文献 >Introduction: New Approaches to Sustainable Offshore Food Production and the Development of Offshore platforms
【2h】

Introduction: New Approaches to Sustainable Offshore Food Production and the Development of Offshore platforms

机译:简介:可持续海上食品生产和海上平台开发的新方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

As we exhaust traditional natural resources upon which we have relied for decades to support economic growth, alternatives that are compatible with a resource conservation ethic, are consistent with efforts to limit greenhouse emissions to combat global climate change, and that support principles of integrated coastal management must be identified. Examples of sectors that are prime candidates for reinvention are electrical generation and seafood production. Once a major force in global economies and a symbol of its culture and character, the fishing industry has experienced major setbacks in the past half-decade. Once bountiful fisheries were decimated by overfishing and destructive fisheries practices that resulted in tremendous biomass of discarded by-catch. Severe restrictions on landings and effort that have been implemented to allow stocks to recover have had tremendous impact on the economy of coastal communities. During the period of decline and stagnation in capture fisheries, global production from aquaculture grew dramatically, and now accounts for 50% of the world’s edible seafood supply. With the convergence of environmental and aesthetic concerns, aquaculture, which was already competing for space with other more established and accepted uses, is having an increasingly difficult time expanding in nearshore waters. Given the constraints on expansion of current methods of production, it is clear that alternative approaches are needed in order for the marine aquaculture sector to make a meaningful contribution to global seafood supply. Farming in offshore marine waters has been identified as one potential option for increasing seafood production and has been a focus of international attention for more than a decade. Though there are technical challenges for farming in the frequently hostile open ocean environment, there is sufficient rationale for pursuing the development of offshore farming. Favorable features of open ocean waters include ample space for expansion, tremendous carrying and assimilative capacity, reduced conflict with many user groups, lower exposure to human sources of pollution, the potential to reduce some of the negative environmental impacts of coastal fish farming (Ryan 2004; Buck 2004; Helsley and Kim 2005; Ward et al. 2006; Langan 2007), and optimal environmental conditions for a wide variety of marine species (Ostrowski and Helsley 2003; Ryan 2004; Howell et al. 2006; Benetti et al. 2006; Langan and Horton 2003). Those features, coupled with advances in farming technology (Fredheim and Langan 2009) would seem to present an excellent opportunity for growth, however, development in offshore waters has been measured. This has been due in large part to the spill over from the opposition to nearshore marine farming and the lack of a regulatory framework for permitting, siting and managing industry development. Without legal access to favorable sites and a “social license” to operate without undue regulatory hardship, it will be difficult for open ocean aquaculture to realize its true potential. Some parallels can be drawn between ocean aquaculture and electricity generation. Continued reliance on traditional methods of production, which for electricity means fossil fuels, is environmentally and economically unsustainable. There is appropriate technology available to both sectors, and most would agree that securing our energy and seafood futures are in the collective national interest. The most advanced and proven renewable sector for ocean power generation is wind turbines, and with substantial offshore wind resources in the, one would think there would be tremendous potential for development of this sector and public support for development. The casual observer might view the ocean as a vast and barren place, with lots of space to put wind turbines and fish farms. However, if we start to map out existing human uses such as shipping lanes, pipelines, cables, LNG terminals, and fishing grounds, and add to that ecological resource areas that require some degree of protection such as whale and turtle migration routes, migratory bird flyways, spawning grounds, and sensitive habitats such as corals, the ocean begins to look like a crowed place. Therefore, when trying to locate new ocean uses, it may be worthwhile to explore possibilities for co-location of facilities, in this case wind turbines and fish and shellfish farms. While some might argue that trying to co-locate two activities that are individually controversial would be a permitting nightmare, general agreement can probably be reached that there are benefits to be gained by reducing the overall footprint of human uses in the ocean. Meeting the challenges of multi-use facilities in the open ocean will require careful analysis and planning; however, the opportunity to co-locate sustainable seafood and renewable energy production facilities is intriguing, the concept is consistent with the goals of Marine Spatial Planning and ecosystem based management, and therefore worthy of pursuit.
机译:当我们用尽数十年来一直赖以支持经济增长的传统自然资源时,与资源节约伦理相适应的替代方案与限制温室气体排放以应对全球气候变化的努力相一致,并支持沿海综合管理原则必须确定。发电和海产品生产是重新发明的主要候选人。渔业曾经是全球经济的主要力量,并且是其文化和特征的象征,在过去的五年中,渔业经历了重大挫折。一旦过度捕捞和破坏性渔业做法使富裕的渔业遭到破坏,导致大量生物量被丢弃的副渔获物。为使种群得以恢复而对登陆和使用的严格限制对沿海社区的经济产生了巨大影响。在捕捞渔业的衰退和停滞时期,水产养殖的全球产量急剧增长,目前占世界食用海鲜供应量的50%。随着环境和美学问题的融合,水产养殖业已经在与其他更成熟和公认的用途竞争空间,在近岸水域发展的时间越来越困难。考虑到当前生产方法的扩大限制,很明显,需要其他方法才能使海水养殖部门对全球海鲜供应做出有意义的贡献。在近海海水中进行养殖已被认为是增加海产品产量的一种潜在选择,并且十多年来一直是国际关注的焦点。尽管在经常处于敌对的开放海洋环境中进行耕作面临技术挑战,但是有足够的理由进行海上养殖。开放海水的有利特征包括广阔的扩展空间,巨大的承载能力和同化能力,减少了与许多用户群体的冲突,减少了人类污染源的暴露,有可能减少沿海鱼类养殖对环境的某些负面影响(Ryan 2004) ; Buck 2004; Helsley和Kim 2005; Ward等2006; Langan 2007),以及各种海洋物种的最佳环境条件(Ostrowski和Helsley 2003; Ryan 2004; Howell等2006; Benetti等2006)。 ; Langan和Horton 2003)。这些特征,再加上农业技术的进步(Fredheim and Langan 2009),似乎为增长提供了绝好的机会,但是,近岸水域的发展已被评估。这在很大程度上是由于反对派对近海海洋养殖业的溢出以及缺乏允许,选址和管理工业发展的监管框架。如果没有合法的机会进入有利的地点,也没有获得“社会许可”就可以在没有不当的监管困难的情况下进行经营,那么开阔海洋水产养殖将很难实现其真正潜力。在海洋水产养殖和发电之间可以得出一些相似之处。继续依靠传统的生产方法(对于电力来说,这意味着化石燃料)在环境和经济上都是不可持续的。两个部门都有适当的技术可用,大多数人都同意确保我们的能源和海产品期货符合国家的集体利益。海上发电中最先进和最成熟的可再生能源部门是风力涡轮机,并且该国拥有大量的海上风力资源,人们会认为该部门的发展潜力和公众对发展的支持。随便的观察者可能会将海洋视为广阔而贫瘠的地方,有很多空间可以放置风力涡轮机和养鱼场。但是,如果我们开始规划现有的人类用途,例如航道,管道,电缆,LNG接收站和渔场,并增加需要一定程度保护的生态资源区域,例如鲸鱼和乌龟的迁徙路线,候鸟在飞道,产卵场和敏感的栖息地(例如珊瑚)之后,海洋开始看起来像人头a动的地方。因此,在尝试寻找新的海洋用途时,有必要探索将设备(例如风力涡轮机,鱼类和贝类养殖场)置于同一地点的可能性。尽管有些人可能会认为试图将两个有争议的活动并置在一起将是一场噩梦,但也许可以达成普遍的共识,即减少人类在海洋中的总使用面积会带来好处。应对公海的多用途设施的挑战将需要仔细的分析和计划;但是,将可持续海产品和可再生能源生产设施共置一处的机会很吸引人,该概念与海洋空间规划和基于生态系统的管理的目标一致,因此值得追求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号